Andrew C. McCarthy
For media inquiries and interview requests, please contact:
Encounter Books: firstname.lastname@example.org
MSNBC SUCK GO FOXS NEWS
ANDY, it’s about time. What took you so long?????
Your book, Spring Fever, looks interesting BUT only available in e-book format??? Come on. I’ll not buy a Kindle to read the thing. How about some hard copy availability?
Is there ANY way to buy a “Spring Fever” download we could print? Your other books I have underlined, high-lighted, cross-referenced, written definitions in the margins (your vocabulary is amazing), stuffed full of index cards. They’re text-books to STUDY. Your book, in e-book format, is just not going to work for some of us. PLEASE allow us some paper!!
Dear Mr.McCarthy..we read all your works/books regularly. We do NOT want an E-book, we would appreciate a text book please!!! We do NOT like the idea of holding a tablet. cheers, renee
Andrew McCarthy, You have become my new hero after reading your PJ Media article on The Wages of Willful Blindness… What a well thought out opinion and it fits with the history of what we are seeing today. I appreciated your willingness to depart from conventional Democrat/Republican thought on Islam. Theirs makes no sense and is inconsistent with the observable facts. I am founder of the 912 Project Tennessee and have been able to separate myself from the GOP to be able to see their weaknesses while lamenting my prior confusion about the GOP being the answer for America. Our hope is in God and righteous principles.
My sincerest thanks for what you do,
Everyone agrees that you are the creme of the cream, the very best that America has ever produced.
BUT WHAT IS THE MEANING OF THE LATEST
SPEECH IMPEDIMENT OF THE STINKING ARABS.
“WASKALY WEBELS NEW LIBYA”.
WASKALY WEBELS NEW WIBYA.
or am i mistaken.
I just couldn’t resist.
I pray for you all of the time, ANDY, and am proud to say so. You are the sole reason it has not become worse than it is.
Mr. McCarthy, I’m a great fan of yours. I have all your books. I followed the Blind Sheikh trials back in the 1990s with great interest. Yours is one of the most important voices on the political scene in regards to the advent of a global caliphate. But we need your words in print. Voice and electronics just won’t do. You can’t quote or verify a “voice” and electronic print has a way of disappearing, along with the truth. I hope you and your publisher will reconsider putting out a print version of Spring Fever.
Mr McCarthy: I’ll just add my voice to those clamoring for a print edition of your new book. E Books are fine for novels and similar items that you’ll probably read only once. For something more substantial, there’s no substitute for print. As someone mentioned above, you need a book to take notes, underline items, make remarks, go back quickly to previous pages and so on….all elements that are present in serious reading. And even if I wanted a Kindle edition, I can’t get it. I currently live in the Middle East and when I went to the Amazon site for your book, they had a big sign that said something to the effect that “This book is unavailable in E-book format for your location”. So it appears NO ONE currently in the Middle East will be able to download your book even if they wanted to. That’s probably a huge audience of readers/buyers that are being shuttered out.
At least, make your book available as an “Print On Demand” publication. That way you only print what’s asked for. I’m not sure how that format works, but it’s something to think about. Thanks.
Mr. McCarthy, it was Lucy, not Linus, who said, “I love mankind. It’s people I can’t stand.”
andy r u an american ? I think and know I dont like u or anything u wtite even if I never read anything u wrote Why u say because what I read what u were writting about the piece of shit person that killed my fellow americans in boston u should have used just a very few words like kill the basterd in the hospital and the father surly the bitch mother o who says the story of her dam dogs thats her dam kids are good kids what is wrong with u everything is about stories and money ? e mail back u —— — — ——–
ps stop writting whatever u write people that reply nice things about u must be from other and not born here and be true americans and yes im vet i was in the NAVY i am 100% service con I dont think u know anything about being an american? let me know also y u should live in my great USA
Given our dubious results in Iraq, after the expense of so much blood and treasure – not to mention gifting Democrats with what appears to be a very long-term lease on the White House, weren’t there at least some Bush Administration advisers arguing against the commitment of ground forces anywhere in the Middle East for the purpose of promoting the installation of western-style democracy – a certainly well-intended but futile and counterproductive policy? In what book[s] is this pivotal decision point recounted?
I just finished your book Spring Fever The Illusion of Islamic Democracy. I thought it was excellent, but there were many typos. You need a better proof reader.
Please, sir. We need print versions of your books. Also, what translation(s) of the Koran did you use as your sources when writing The Grand Jihad and Arab Spring? Thank you.
I’m a huge fan of yours. I came across this in a book on the history of economics. The bit on “infiltrating and indoctrinating the political parties and institutions of the West” reminded me of the brotherhood. Fabian Islamists…
The London School of Economics, established in 1895, is considered one of the most
prestigious colleges in the world. Many famous people have been associated with the
LSE, including the playwright George Bernard Shaw, socialist Harold Laski, Nobel
Prize–winning economist Friedrich A. Hayek, and rock-and-roll singer Mick Jagger (as
LSE was created by prominent members of the Fabian Society, all socialists—
Sidney and Beatrice Webb and Bernard Shaw, the most gifted dramatist of the age.
The Fabian Society was established in the mid-1880s to convince bourgeois intellectuals
of the virtues of socialism. It was named after Quintus Fabius Maximus, a Roman
general who avoided defeat by refusing to fight Hannibal head-on. The Fabian socialists
rejected the revolutionary methods of the Marxists; rather they sought to achieve
the same ends by infiltrating and indoctrinating the political parties and institutions of
the West. This indirect gradualist approach proved extremely successful in twentiethcentury
Britain, which experienced high levels of nationalization and welfarism. In fact,
Sidney Webb established the British Labour Party in 1906.
Mr. McCarty, What is happening to our country is a shame. I truly believe obamacare is similar to the German Enabling Act. A complete take-over. I found an excerpt of obama care by The Southern Baptist Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission, it reads under Sec. 1173A: ” For Doctors in Residency-the government will now be involved in educating doctors or indoctrinating them into their government controlled health care mindset. A bureaucrat will determine where you can do your residency and what you will be specializing in during that residency.
The magnitude of the bill along with the numerous citations to other legislation makes it nearly impossible to figure out what everything in the bill actually means.The commission states………….. Now to me it means the government can change the rules at any time…..Just like obama, with the laws he likes and ones he doesn’t like. ICE, EPA, Boarder Patrol, IRS and dumping
And if that is not shocking enough, the commission states ” The House Health Care Bill would create a program for senior citizens that likely would include education about end-of-life decisions and impacts on families. This program could essentially encourage the premature death of the elderly. This “Advance Care Planning Consultation” could be a slippery slope that potentially leads to euthanasia.
By the simple act of mandatory insurance on a certain group of people and preferential hierarchy of others, completely destroys our country, and our Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
The government will would decide who should live or die. Like England or the Netherlands.
The government will decide who has abortions and who can keep their babies, Like China.
Thanks for shining the beacon of freedom into the darkest corners of government…. Surely both DOJ and the Fourth Estate could take some lessons (although I won’t hold my breathe).
Your article (23-Nov-2013) about scheme behind the Obamacare fraud was right on the money. The challenge is how to present that picture to the typical low-information voters, who understand neither the free-market or socialist models nor how that has any bearing on their lives. I see it as trying to pitch a long-term investment to someone who will drink away his entire week’s paycheck with his loyal friend Jack Daniels by describing the security and promising high interest rate. Details only matter once the controlling concepts and princples are understood.
Further than your article went, though, is the broader Alinskyite scheme – state controlled life, not just health care. In economics, foreign policy, military and intelligence, jurisprudence, and basic existence, Obama, like his mentors and friends, seek social justice – which is neither social nor just. But since it sounds good for the proletariate, it is accepted by the liberals, promoted by the media, and sold to the populace. What will they think when they discover that scheme? Or will it be too late?
Keep up your trumpeting of freedom. How do we connect all of these pieces to map out the broad picture?
“What difference does is make?” How about two presidencies?
The question that should be asked regarding the Benghazi attack is: Did Obama, Hillary and their staff discuss the political fallout resulting from the attack while the attack was going on?
Maybe that’s why Obama was AWOL while the Embassy was under siege. He and Hillary and their staff went into serious damage control to salvage their political careers. That’s not too far fetched when you consider there were potentially two presidencies at risk: Obama’s re-election that by every account was going to be very close and Hillary’s in 2016.
How did they come up with the “Video” excuse? This was totally made up. Isn’t it obvious how that one scenario conveniently provides cover for both Obama and Hillary? A successful terrorist attack on an American Embassy would be very costly politically because it would show Obama as being weak on defense and Hillary as incompetent.
They tried hard to sell the video excuse to the American people and were lying every time they mentioned it. Why was Susan Rice sent out to promote the lie and not Hillary? If you remember Hillary quickly left the country to avoid questions and stonewalled for months and then eventually wants us to think the whole event is ancient history.
If Obama had requested additional support during the attack then the “Protest Over a Video” excuse would not have worked. He would have to admit that he knew the attack was more than a protest.
The Democrat’s slogan should be “Politics First” because for them it always is regardless if it’s national defense, economy, foreign policy, women’s rights, you name it. Unfortunately this time politics came before four American lives.
You’re an asshole.
Mr. McCarthy, Thank you for your article at NRO( ‘Blame the Video’ Fraud…), and your discussion of the events in Cairo prior to the Benghazi attack. While I wouldn’t put it past this administration to fabricate ‘the video’ excuse to benefit politically, I don’t think that is what happened. I have always thought that the State Department’s “shrieking over the video”, as you put it, from the embassy in Cairo, was their attempt to introduce the excuse for what would later happen in Benghazi. I wonder if Ambassador Stevens knew damaging information about what the State Dept. was doing in Libya (The Blaze TV reported there is evidence of weapons being funneled to terrorists in Libya) and that this attack was planned by the administration to get rid of him. If I remember correctly, the State Dept. denied requests for security and even removed security prior to the attack. They created the video fairy-tale before the attack occurred and seemed pretty intent on selling that as the excuse. During the attack, the military was not allowed to provide help. The President was nowhere to be found during the critical decision-making period that night. And to my knowledge, we haven’t punished anyone responsible for the attacks (except the maker of the video). It looks like more than just image control going on, if you ask me. Before you call me crazy, think about the dangerous people this administration is associated with. With that in mind, please don’t post this message. Please delete it. Thanks again for the work you do. I always enjoy hearing you being interviewed.
I wanted to thank you so much for all the work you have done and are doing in acquainting Westerners with the reality of Islam. A question for Muslims that has not yet been raised to my knowledge is: “Were the Prophet Muhammad to miraculously appear today — whom would he immediately recognize, find commonality with and rush to join: the Jihadis (i.e., religiously justified terrorists, bandits and Fifth Columnists) or ‘Moderate Muslims’ (i.e., either the lukewarm or non-practicing with any thoughts of conquest on indefinite hold )?” I would anticipate more silence. In my opinion this problem simply can not be fixed within Islam and Western Civilization must face that reality and prepare accordingly. Again, many thanks.
Mr. McCarthy: I’ve exchanged some emails with Daniel Pipes in the past, and respect his work very much. But I disagree that Islam can be reformed. Christianity was reformed because good people went back to what their holy book actually said and rejected the corruption of the medieval church. Islam was “moderate” for a long time because they didn’t follow their holy book, the Koran, and because they were held in check by the military power of the West. In the late 20th century and up to now, they have gone back to what their book actually says, and that has led them more in the direction of bin Laden than someone like Zuhdi Jasser.
We should remember that at the time Mohammed died in 632 AD, almost all the area west of Saudi Arabia was Christian (about 90%). Today, it is less than 10% in North Africa and everywhere in the Middle East except Israel. In 732, a century after Mohammed died, the Muslim advance was halted at the Battle of Tours in France, and centuries later, Muslims were expelled from Spain in 1492 and from Austria in 1529. The people who defeated the Muslims of those times knew who and what they were. Islam is not an evangelical religion spread by persuasion; it is a predatory religion spread by intimidation and conquest. True Islam will never be democratic or moderate. To hope so is to weaken the West, and to believe in fantasies.
Dear Mr. McCarthy:
On Monday, June 2, 2014, you were interviewed by Mr. Mark R. Levin on the nationally syndicated radio show entitled “The Mark Levin Show,” and both you and Mr. Levin were weak in your presentation to show up the bad nature of Barack Obama and his associates. You and Mr. Levin use mushy words, such as “tyranny,” to define Barack Obama and like persons. By the way, another truly mushy word is “statist,” which, when heard by someone, instills no great fear in the mind. Until you begin to regularly call Barack Obama and like persons an “enslavist” (a word that is structured around “slavery), you will not raise fear in people well enough get them to act, and you will not give regular persons a word with which to use to put down Barack Obama to people who need to know the true nature of Barack Obama and like persons, who are working to create an “enslavism” form of government in the country, such as something like communism. If you are at a grocery store and you are trying to explain the nature of Barack Obama to someone you do not know, say–“Barack Obama is an enslavist!” Say that to yourself right now. Notice you do not need to define the word to your listener or listeners, as you do when using “statist.” The word “enslavist” has force and makes people take notice. In addition, “liberal” is a useless word to use in trying to define a bad man.
Victor Swanson, publisher
The Hologlobe Press
A simple question, from a simple man, Why debate impeachment when the proper charge should be High Treason ! By his own mouth and actions he is guilty, and it would only be fitting that he suffer the required punishment if convicted.
9/11/12 just weeks away You know there will be a protest somewhere..(state).You find a video…You put it in your back pocket. and Wait..You know that if anything happens that becomes more than a protest DEFENSE is in charge . State is off the HOOK?..OUTSIDE OF DC is there in America outside of me that believes that Penetta and Chief of Staff of the Services Thinks that they went to the WH to report A PROTEST…Meetings can be on the docket everyday …REMEMBER many other people in Benghazi have phones some may have by passed state and were in directly connect with Defense many hours or even a few days ahead of the attack, with INTEL I also find it Hard to believe that DAVID AND DAVID had to find out the reason for the attack in Benghazi on Sunday the 16th….Lets look at the possible Suez Sunday Message ‘ IT was a TERRORIST attack” Suez would be flipping Hamburgers today…..Could have BEN tipped the talking points to the Campaign? Could Ben got the NOD OK? These emails on the 14th smoke and mirrors….Everyone on vacation on the 12th and the 13th…THINK THINK IF you say to Penetta I”LL GET BACK To YOU…and you do not for 9 Hours that’s the SAME AS a STAND DOWN order if you have no “GO ORDER” If I were Prez during the Missing ( hours I would be Listening to events in REAL TIME along with my TRUSTED CAMPAIGN TEAM What do I Know!
OCEAN, RIGHT ON THE MONEY…Rhodes tipped the talking points to Axelrod…Ben could not give talking points to RICE without approval from the TEAM and if the TEAM knew then the ONE knew..When you have the PRESS in your pocket you can say anything.. However when you are in front of a House Hearing you have to guard your words with AND IFS or BUTS and you Take the Middle of the ROAD again with MAYBES and couldas wouldas and shouldas
Just saw you on Judge Jeanine discussing impeachment. One more red flag: Miriam Ibraham (sp) in prison with 2 little AMERICAN children yet State Dept wants proof they are NOT MUSLIMS! Obama is upholding Sharia law over 3 American citizen prisoners. He swore oath to uphold our Constitution not sharia law! Enough for this traitor!
Every policy Obama has is to accomplish his purpose, the transition of America into a much weakened republic. Few public figures recognize his motives even though they may be close to doing so. Your comments on Kelly File last night were very close to the point. Obama does all he can to create confusion, chaos and contention, whether it is in immigration, energy, environment, foreign affairs, education, health care or defense of this nation, When it gets bad enough it will provide the excuse for a military takeover with the military aided by armed IRS agents, Land Management troopers, Agriculture Department employees with submachine guns and the various and sundry thugs he has to obey his orders. Perhaps the Muslims also! our citizens must wake up to this tragedy in process or they will end in slavery. Thanks for your contributions to the fight for freedom.
What America needs is a 4th branch of government…an Oversight branch with teeth, that can throw out politicians that break the law before too much damage is done. It should be run by real patriots that have served their country at ranks not higher than Lt Col. and the decision making should be based on metrics of good governance. No politician should be allowed to break the law and get away with it.
This is a very powerful and well written book which I agree with 100%!
Obama will be the last president of the US. There may be 1 year of all life after the election in 2016. Jardalkal@aol.com
Dear Mr. McCarthy – I hope this finds you well.
If one puts together a “timeline” of Benghazi Sunday morning shows.
It would seem Ms. Rice would have known Saturday of her appearances.
It would seem that the “talking points” would have been fully developed by the evening.
However it lacks credibility that a video can be found and vetted in hours as ‘causal’.
Especially if it is in a foreign language, that few other than perhaps the
president might be familiar with. Presuming the audio was indeed original.
Hence it would seem more likely that the video was on the shelf, ready to run, as an
“excuse” for any “terrorist” event that might materialize during re-election season.
This is based on politial candidates admitting to being taken offsite and having
Party persons rehearse or “brief” or “war-game” situations and answers prior
to any public appearances.
It would seem an obvious issue to ‘war-game’ would be a terrorist event.
Ms. Clinton would likely have recalled the media surrounding the
TWA flight 800 during the summer of 1996 of Pres. Clinton’s reelection
Clearly and ostensibly to thwart any politcal opponents that might fault the incumbent,
for random acts of terrorism, blame should be placed elsewhere.
Agreements would be made as to who or what to blame.
Recent memory “attacks” as a result of a ‘book burning’ or a cartoon in
a Danish Newspaper have no shelf life. A video solves both these issues.
Blaming the Copts who are victims in their country seems a poor choice.
So to check their story, which might have truthful elements some investigation
Is needed. The IRS might indeed have had a disk crash. Especially if one removes
The disk and throws in down. Then indeed one could testify that it crashed.
We sense that this administration has persons acutely aware of obstruction of justice.
Staff rotates constantly so as to say “not me” or “before my time” or “after my time” or
“no recollection” or whatever.
Perhaps you and/or Mr. Gowdy subpoena Utube and find out
The “IP” address of the poster of the purported video.
One could then use the IP to Geographical lookup
such as http://www.iplocation.net/ to find where it was posted from.
One would then do the same for “downloads”. Then one would check each download
and see where it was. That would be step#1.
But supposing more than a few persons were complicit in this mission,
and knowing the parent of Utube (Google) are fully complicit and fearful of
various intel agencies, one would need to do more due diligence.
For instance, “who exactly” by name and address were the downloaders of the
video. Then one would go and interview them and find out all about them.
Also, find out the supposed poster of the video. Even with the evidently “staged”
arrest in Southern California, complete with black hood (intel agency style),
we know nothing of this person. A patsy? Someone complicit? Who knows?
Finally, some confounding issues, that may seem odd, but need to be
On the fringe, a coworker suggested that Ambassador Stevens was hated.
The justification for this is the events themselves.
On another fringe, it was suggested that because the US did not ensure
Khadaffi’s safety, at least until trial as with others ousted in the area,
That this was a Quid Pro Quo and the administration deliberately turned a
blind eye to the events. The justification for this is the various Arab press
articles touting that Ambassador Stevens was sodomized as was Khadaffi
And so their sense of vengeance was realized. This adminstration was a
fall supporter of the “Arab Spring”, but power brokers in the area (read Saudi’s)
may have frowned upon the Khadaffi treatment. This would also explain the
seeming success of the Syrian president. Until safe passage is guaranteed,
he will likely remain in office.
Perhaps rather than blow out this small match, Boehner, we should be breathing life into any and all “matches” whether they be Tea Partiers, RINO’s, entrenched politicos, Libertarians, Gays or Dems. Perhaps, if we get enough “matches” ignited, we can begin the process you speak of in your excellent book. You are a giant among us. We have your shoulders to stand on. Let’s overlook our “criticisms” of each other and see our Nation made up of individuals doing what they can and not a “collective” ruled by an Oligarchy. We need each and every individual not matter what their “ineffective” intentions may be. Perhaps enough of these “ineffective” intentions may be just the tinder we need.
please get on the sean hannity program and fox and friends and the mike huckabee show and booktv to talk about your book faithless execution also hope you will come to tampa for a book signing there is a barns and nobel in carolwood fla and a inkwood books in tampa please let me know of any signing email@example.com
If we caught someone that targeted American Citizens and caused them harm or death we would arrest them. My best friend lives in a small town in East Texas, Owns his 7 acres of land, his house is fully paid for so all he has to do is make enough for the bills and enjoy his life. Well when Obama Care came out he didn’t have insurance so he went and signed up. There is a loop hole in Obama Care that no one knows about. If you don’t earn a certain amount of money you do NOT qualify for the Obama Care insurance at the subsidized cost. You do however qualify for the insurance at the full price which he couldn’t afford in the first place. He broke his femur 6 months ago and needs hip replacement surgery but can’t get it because he doesn’t have health insurance. 4 Doctors and 4 Hospitals have sent him hobbling home with some crappy pain killers and told him to come back when he can afford to pay for the hip, surgery, doctors, and pay the hospital.
Somebody help me and see if I’m confused, President Obama created, signed and approved Obama Care. Obama Care targets a huge group of tax paying American citizens and causes them harm or even death because it PREVENTS them from getting insurance which I thought (But must be wrong) The Affordable Health Care Act (Obama Care) was made to help exactly those people?
The President shouldn’t be impeached! He should be arrest for Terrorism just like we would do with any one else that targeted Americans and caused them Harm or Death.
ARREST HIM DON’T Impeach Him!
Excellent book. Well presented. Couldn’t put it down. Too bad the politics won’t lead to impeachment.
The “Chevron deference” I was taught in law school is a two part thing:
1. The statute must be ambiguous. (“susceptible of two interpretations”)
2. The ageny’s gap-filling response must be reasonable.
Since the text in question is NOT ambiguous, and since nothing in Chevron allows an agency to fix whatever it thinks is a “mitsake,” the DC Cir is correct while the 4th Cir is not.
But on your “not a drafting error” NRO comment, “Demosthenes” told “Colonel Travis” an hour ago that “The whole point of Chevron Deference is if the law as written contains a clear mistake that is inconsistent with the law’s intent and purpose, then an agency’s interpretation has great weight.” No, that’s just plain wrong.
Our president has been committing passive treason. Will not stop ISIS when informed long ago.
Sides with hamas. Letting Iran get nukes. Letting putin have his way. Opening borders fo infiltration.
When they come he will join them and let us types be killed. Fund raiser is paramont to prevent the other party that would have a. War on terror. I only hope that you can put forth an argument through these and your facts thatl can proccure a true impeachment on these grounds.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Return to top of page
Blog at WordPress.com. · The Minimum Theme.